|
...Dismissing
the Scriptures of the King of the Jews
The Heresy of MarcionWhile many early Church Fathers such as St. Cyprian and Hilary of Poifers had the unfortunate distinction of promoting doctrinal anti-semitism, Marcion bears the distinction of founding a position, later deemed heretical in which any adherence to the Old Testament is seen as unnecessary or even dangerous to Christian Doctrine. Marcionism, a heresy recognized for centuries by most Churches from the Roman Church to Evangelical Churches, demands a dismissal of the Old Testament in light of the replacing Covenant and text, the New Testament and even more remarkable, Marcion argued that the Jews had a separate God, a God of Wrath while Christians had a God of benevolence. Variations on the position historically can range the view that most Old Testament Doctrine and teaching does not apply to the Christian, to extreme Marcionism in which the Old Testament is seen as unnecessary and even dangerous,having been done away with by the advent of the Gospel. While not going by the name "Marcionism" in public Church circles, this insidious doctrine finds it's way unpronounced in many modern American Churches, and the principles of extreme Marcionism strongly characterized the calls for reform in the German Christian Church by the Nazis in the 1930s and 1940s.
Jots and Tittles: Does the Law Disappear?To understand both why Marcionism is a heresy and why its re-introduction by the National Socialists was catalytic in the events and nature of the Church in WWII, one must first understand what the Scriptures themselves teach about this position. Neither the Old nor the New Testament ever teach the dissolution of the Law or Covenants in the Old Testament. Jesus himself makes the following statement regarding the Law or Commandments of the First Covenants:
Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
and in the Old Testament, the eternal nature of the Word and Commandments is mentioned in numerous passages including:
Psa 119:160 Thy word [is] true [from] the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments [endureth] for ever.
(and all of Psalm 119). While a lengthy treatise on the Law vs Grace, or the New Covenant vs the Old Covenant is not the main focus here, it is clear in countless passages, that the the Old Testament is NOT done away with in the New Testament, in deed, Jesus says that He has come not to do away with the Law, but "to fulfill it"3. Discussions of the relationship between the Old and New Testament are problematic in the Church, and often misunderstood in the general public and among those of other faiths. The discussion is critical though. The traditionally held belief in the Church is that the covenants and promises of the Old Testament, point to the Coming New Testament: the Messiah of God, promised from Genesis 3:16 is found replete in the Old Testament in shadow and type in every book, there are prophecies of His nature, His coming, and His Timing and Purpose: He is seen in the progressive revelations of the glory of God, and the Abrahamic Covenant, and this position has been held by the Roman Church, most Protestant Churches and the Evangelical/Fundamental Churches as well throughout history.
Marcion and GoebbelsMarcion, when rejected early was rejected because of his exclusion of hundreds of passages of scripture and his misinterpretation of scriptures to express the Old Testament influence as "done away with" and not only 'not essential' but even dangerous to Christian practice and belief. Marcionism was the original 'replacement' theology, in which the Jews were not just displaced, but replaced and was accompanied by an unbridled distaste for the Jews. Goebbels in the years before the war picked up on this as a constant theme: while he did not specifically refer to 'Marcionism', he 'preached' constantly to the Church that for the Christian in the Third Reich, which was presented at first as a national period of Law, Order, and rebirth of the Germany people and destiny, the Old Testament influence on German Christianity must be done away with also. He reasoned in impassioned pleas to abandon Old Testament views, mores, and concepts in favor of a "New Testament Only" position. (There are still churches with this belief both implicit an explicit). The reason for the appeal of this belief sometimes even in the Christian community, is a misreading of the Gospel not as a fulfillment of the Covenants of Scripture only but as outright replacement. In this distorted view, the Gospel becomes singular, not needing the Old Testament for practice or interpretation. Essentially, the effect of the Old Testament and Covenant became for the Jews alone, and therefore unessential for the Christian. More than that, to Goebbels, Hitler, Himmler and others, including certain Theologians of the time, the Old Testament was also seen as inferior as the Jews were seen as an inferior and 'past' race. Coupled with the reinterpretations of the meaning and 'metaphor' of the Gospel in Nazi Churches wherein Jesus became a prototype "Superman" misunderstood as being Jewish, and Paul became a self-obsessed Jew with an inferiority complex, the Gospel, divorced of its Jewish roots, became a redefined vehicle for oncoming Nazi ideology.The Effects of Gutting the GospelWhile the Roman Catholic Church historically has been no great friend of the Jew, and its record in the holocaust remains questioned, it has been unchanging in its denouncement of 'marcionism' in all forms: it has retained firmly the necessity of the Gospel remaining in context of its Jewish heritage in the Old Testament. Both the Catholic, Protestant and Evangelical traditionally held position is that the Old Testament and New Testament are parts of a whole: that Messiah is prophesied, shadowed, and expounded in the Old and fulfilled in the New. Jesus states with utter clarity that not one 'jot or tittle' of the Law [Hebrew: torah} will pass away till all things be fulfilled. The Gospel would make little sense in some passages divorced from its history. The adage of the Old in the New and the New in the Old holds true.While Marcion declared centuries ago that it was not necessary and in fact detrimental to engage the Old Testament in Christian belief, that position has always led to heresy, anti-semitism and a disturbing distortion in doctrine. Among the distortions that accompany this position are:
While not specifically Marcionism, Goebbels and others from the Third Reich also redefined Christ as a prototype of the 'Superman' of the Master Race, and re-interpreted many passages to indicate a support for a veiled Social darwinism. The dismissing of the importance of the Old Testament to the Christian is a vital error but oddly may be seen even in Modern American theology at opposite ends: Save for the occasional reading of Psalms or short passages, many liberal World-Church oriented denominations implicitly dismiss its importance focusing on calendar-oriented liturgy and set forms of worship based entirely on the Life of Christ, and often seeing salvation as by baptism instead of belief and as being irrelevant for other religions including the Jews. Liberal Mainline Denominations have become more of a 'neo-christianity' not adhering to age old precepts and doctrines but reinterpreting them in philosophical light into a continuation of a benevolent, social gospel, focused on good deeds and not an atonement for sin. Conversely, many white aryan religious groups either reinterpret or dismiss the Old Testament, the rationale of which is obvious and follows the arguments of Hitler, Goebbels, Kittl and others. Most surprisingly though, is a move in the american Evangelical Church in which some churches even advertise themselves as a "New Testament" Church and incorporate aspects of Marcionism in their doctrine. These churches are a little more difficult to deal with because they do not align themselves with the Nazis or anti-Semitism, and may even see themselves as very pro-Israel or pro-Jewish, but dismiss the importance and influence of the Old Testament except historically, but the process of divorce from the Old Testament has the same doctrinal base. In some ways, this manifestation can be even more dangerous because it contains the dangerous doctrinal strain of the heresy without any overt prejudice. Doctrinally, the reason diverse groups such as the Catholic Church, Baptists, Evangelicals and Pentecostals have all held this position in error firmly, noting that our faith is not the same without both Covenants. The Old Testament points continuously towards a coming Messiah, the New towards the fulfillment. There is more though, in that the Old Testament points to an eternal Covenant, which will come about as Emanuel, God-With-Us, becomes internalized, and the promises of the indwelling glory of God in an eternal covenant, life and temple are formed, as in the prophesies and visions of Zechariah. There is no difference doctrinally in the Old and New Testament: Salvation is of the Jews in both, Salvation is by blood, in covenant in both. Righteousness is a gift from God and given by God in both: the Psalms constantly refer to God giving Righteousness, not to its being earned. Descriptions of the Creation and Day of Jacob's Trouble are utterly consistent as are passages regarding the Bride, Bridegroom, Armaggedon, the Millenial Reign, and promises to Israel. Likewise the view of Law and Grace and the character and nature of God, his Glory and his divine creation and spiritual warfare are the same throughout. Differences are pivotal between the Jew and Christian almost solely on the identity of the Messiah, and works-salvation, although in the most pristine view, works-salvation is not really the teaching of Torah. |
The Tenach & the 3rd Reich
New Testament Passages About the Old Testament
-------
|
OUTSIDE LINKS
xxxxxxx |
xxxxxx |
under development....please visit again |